DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000114·napa·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 2 months agoAppearance required

Conservatorship of Randall Rolla C. Byers

Petition for Appointment of Probate Conservator of the Person – Limited Conservatorship

Hearing date
Jun 17, 2026
Department
A
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherRandall Rolla C. Byers

Ruling

the condition of the estate, the reasons why the estate cannot be distributed and closed, and an estimate of time needed to close administration of the estate. (Prob. Code, § 12202, subd. (a).)

In The Matter of Karen K. Carson Revocable Trust 26PR000040

SECOND AMENDED PETITION FOR ORDERS

TENTATIVE RULING: The matter is CONTINUED to July 30, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. Petitioner is directed to provide notice of the continued hearing to all persons entitled thereto.

There is no proof of service of the Amended Petition and no proof of service of the Notice of Hearing in the Court’s file. (See Probate Code § 17203 [requiring 30 days’ notice of hearing on trust matters].) The Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on a matter that has not been properly noticed for hearing on the date in question. (See Diaz v. Prof. Community Management, Inc. (2017) 16 Cal.App.5th 1190, 1204-05.)

Conservatorship of Brandon Ramirez Corro 26PR000081

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON – LIMITED CONSERVATORSHIP

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

Conservatorship of Randall Rolla C. Byers 26PR000114

PETITION FOR APPOINTMENT OF PROBATE CONSERVATOR OF THE PERSON – LIMITED CONSERVATORSHIP

APPEARANCE REQUIRED: According to the Court Investigator report, Petitioner no longer wishes to establish the proposed conservatorship. However, Petitioner has not formally dismissed the Petition. Petitioner is directed to appear to inform the Court if she intends to pursue this matter. In the absence of any appearance, the Court will dismiss the Petition without prejudice. To the extent Petitioner wishes to pursue the conservatorship, the matter will be continued as the following required documents are missing from the Court file: (1) Proof of Service on relatives within the second degree and on the proposed conservatee; (2) Regional Center Report; (3) Confidential Supplemental Information form (GC-312); (4) Capacity Declaration (GC-335); and (5) Proposed order (GC-340) and letters (GC-350).

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share