PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT
Browse all Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement rulings statewide →
LAW AND MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DATE: JULY 8, 2026 TIME: 8:30 A.M.
TENTATIVE RULINGS ARE NOT POSTED IN UNLAWFUL DETAINER CASES
Notice to prevailing parties: Local Rule 2.10.01 requires you to submit a proposed formal order incorporating, verbatim, the language of any tentative ruling – or attaching and incorporating the tentative by reference - or an order consistent with the announced ruling of the Court, in accordance with California Rule of Court 3.1312. Such proposed order is required even if the prevailing party submitted a proposed order prior to the hearing with two exceptions: (1) in unopposed matters where the moving party has provided a detailed proposed order or JCC form of order, or (2) where the tentative is simply to “grant”. Failure to comply with Local Rule 2.10.01 may result in the imposition of sanctions following an order to show cause hearing, if a proposed order is not timely filed.
No. 25CV01486
DEWAR v. GOGH DELIVERY, LLC
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND PAGA SETTLEMENT
The motion is denied without prejudice. On July 1, 2026, plaintiffs filed this motion, just 4 court days before the hearing on July 8, 2026. (Friday, July 4, was a court holiday.) Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1005, subdivision (b), and this Court’s order granting preliminary approval, the motion must have been filed at least 16 court days before the final approval hearing. Counsel did not timely file the motion, seek an order shortening time, or request a continuance of the final approval hearing so the motion is denied without prejudice
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”