DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV076161·alameda·Civil·Civil
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

SILVA vs UCS LIMO LLC, DBA UCS LIMO SERVICE, DBA SF COACH LIMO, DBA UCS WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION, et al.

Demurrer To Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
21
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 28, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSILVA
DefendantUCS LIMO LLC, DBA UCS LIMO SERVICE, DBA SF COACH LIMO, DBA UCS WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION

Ruling

24CV076161: SILVA vs UCS LIMO LLC, DBA UCS LIMO SERVICE, DBA SF COACH LIMO, DBA UCS WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION, et al. 07/07/2026 Hearing on Demurrer To Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; filed by UCS LIMO LLC, DBA UCS LIMO SERVICE, DBA SF COACH LIMO, DBA UCS WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION (Defendant) + CRS# 967520640601 in Department 21

Tentative Ruling - 07/01/2026 S. Raj Chatterjee

The Hearing on Demurrer To Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint; filed by UCS LIMO LLC, DBA UCS LIMO SERVICE, DBA SF COACH LIMO, DBA UCS WORLDWIDE TRANSPORTATION (Defendant) + CRS# 967520640601 scheduled for 07/07/2026 is continued to 07/28/2026 at 02:30 PM in Department 21 at Rene C. Davidson Courthouse.

CONTINUED to be heard on same date as motion for terminating sanctions.

PLEASE NOTE: This tentative ruling will become the ruling of the court if uncontested by 04:00pm the day before your hearing. If you wish to contest the tentative ruling, then both notify opposing counsel directly and the court at the eCourt portal found on the court’s website: www.alameda.courts.ca.gov.

If you have contested the tentative ruling or your tentative ruling reads, “parties to appear,” please use the following link to access your hearing at the appropriate date and time: https://alameda-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/my/department21. If no party has contested the tentative ruling, then no appearance is necessary.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share