DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25680476·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
DENIED

MARLENE M. STAUFENBIEL VS. TREVOR DILLING ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Hearing date
Apr 9, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Motion for Summary Judgment

Parties

PlaintiffMARLENE M. STAUFENBIEL
DefendantTREVOR DILLING
DefendantHELEN DILLING

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 9, 2026. Line 5. DEFENDANT TREVOR DILLING, HELEN DILLING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT is DENIED. Triable issues exist regarding whether Defendants' tenancy is exempt from the rent increase limitations of the Tenant Protection Act of 2019. Plaintiff's amended opposition filed April 1, 2026 and Defendant's reply to the amended opposition filed April 7, 2026 are stricken as the Order continuing this matter from April 1, 2026 to April 9, 2026 did not authorize any supplemental filings. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share