GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. DAWN SCHWANDT ET AL
Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679683 - April 7, 2026 Hearing date: April 7, 2026 Case number: CUD25679683 Case title: GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. DAWN SCHWANDT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679683 | Case Title: | | GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. DAWN SCHWANDT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-04-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation; Declaration In Support | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for April 7, 2026. Line 7.
PLAINTIFF GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC Motion For Entry Of Judgment For Monetary Damages Pursuant To Stipulation is MOOT. First Amended Stipulation on file. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.