ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL
Notice And Motion For Relief From Default
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615290 - March 24, 2026 Hearing date: March 24, 2026 Case number: CGC24615290 Case title: ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615290 | Case Title: | | ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice And Motion For Relief From Default; Declaration Of Sharon S. Jeffrey; Declaration Of Kyla Holcomb-Piramoon | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 24, 2026. Line 2.
DEFENDANT ONERENT INC. DBA POPLAR HOMES Motion For Relief From Default; is continued to April 9, 2026, for the parties to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition and reply papers no later than April 2, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Moving papers received.) =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.