DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC24615290·sf·Civil·Real Property
CONTINUED

ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL

Notice And Motion For Relief From Default

Hearing date
Mar 24, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 9, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffADAM FAGEL
DefendantOYVIND SEAN KINSEY
DefendantONERENT INC. DBA POPLAR HOMES

Attorneys

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24615290 - March 24, 2026 Hearing date: March 24, 2026 Case number: CGC24615290 Case title: ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24615290 | Case Title: | | ADAM FAGEL ET AL VS. OYVIND SEAN KINSEY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice And Motion For Relief From Default; Declaration Of Sharon S. Jeffrey; Declaration Of Kyla Holcomb-Piramoon | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 24, 2026. Line 2.

DEFENDANT ONERENT INC. DBA POPLAR HOMES Motion For Relief From Default; is continued to April 9, 2026, for the parties to comply with LRSF 2.7B and provide courtesy copies of the opposition and reply papers no later than April 2, 2026 with a cover letter reflecting the new hearing date. (Moving papers received.) =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share