ESTELLE MONDERER VS. CARL FOX ET AL
DEFENDANT CARL FOX DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680888 - March 18, 2026 Hearing date: March 18, 2026 Case number: CUD25680888 Case title: ESTELLE MONDERER VS. CARL FOX ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680888 | Case Title: | | ESTELLE MONDERER VS. CARL FOX ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | REAL PROPERTY/HOUSING MOTIONS CALENDAR | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 18, 2026.
Line 8. DEFENDANT CARL FOX DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED WITH FINAL LEAVE TO AMEND to address in good faith all issues raised by the demurrer. Plaintiff shall have 5 days from notice of entry of order to file a second amended complaint. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.