DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25626224·sf·Civil·Real Property
CONTINUED

FREDRIC VINNA VS. YAN HONG-HEIM ET AL

Motion For Order To Stay Action Pending Mediation

Hearing date
Mar 17, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Apr 2, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffFREDRIC VINNA
DefendantYAN HONG-HEIM

Attorneys

Mark J. Ricefor Plaintiff

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25626224 - March 17, 2026 Hearing date: March 17, 2026 Case number: CGC25626224 Case title: FREDRIC VINNA VS. YAN HONG-HEIM ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25626224 | Case Title: | | FREDRIC VINNA VS. YAN HONG-HEIM ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Order To Stay Action Pending Mediation; Proposed Order; Memorandum Of Points & Authorities; Declaration Of Mark J. Rice | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 17, 2026. Line 7.1. PLAINTIFF FREDRIC VINNA Motion For Order To Stay Action Pending Mediation; is continued to April 2, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share