ANASTASIIA LISINETCKAIA VS. NUVOLUM, INC., A CORPORATION ET AL

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, March 17, 2026, Line 8. 3 - Plaintiff Anastasiia Lisinetckaia's Motion To Compel Further Responses Re Defendant Nuvolum, Inc.'s Further Responses To Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories (Set 1) And Request For Monetary Sanctions is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

Plaintiff's motion is based on Code of Civil Procedure sections 2030.300. "On receipt of a response to interrogatories, the propounding party may move for an order compelling a further response if the propounding party deems that any of the following apply: (1) An answer to a particular interrogatory is evasive or incomplete. (2) An exercise of the option to produce documents under Section 2030.230 is unwarranted or the required specification of those documents is inadequate. (3) An objection to an interrogatory is without merit or too general." (Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.300(a).)

Plaintiff demonstrated adequate efforts to meet and confer. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040.) The discovery at issue appears reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure Section 2017.010.) Plaintiff demonstrated the responses identified below were incomplete and/or evasive. As to the responses identified below, Defendant Nuvolum, Inc. did not demonstrate the merit of any objection. The objections, thus, are overruled.

Defendant to provide further responses to Plaintiff's Special Interrogatories, Set One Nos. 1, 2 and 4-10. The court does not find that Defendant or its counsel acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery and motion. Defendant Nuvolum and its counsel Miles Archer Woodlief, jointly and severally, shall pay $2,660 to Plaintiff Anastasiia Lisinetckaia as sanctions, payment no later than 20 court days from notice of this order. (Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030, 2031.310(h), 2031.320(d).)

To the extent Petitioners seek additional or different relief, the motion is denied.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court