DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24613243·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

AMERICAN FUND MANAGEMENT ONE LP, A CALIFORNIA VS. ANDERS FUNG ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Third Amended Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 5, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffAMERICAN BAY AREA FUND MANAGEMENT LLC
DefendantANDERS FUNG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC24613243 - July 7, 2026 Hearing date: July 7, 2026 Case number: CGC24613243 Case title: AMERICAN FUND MANAGEMENT ONE LP, A CALIFORNIA VS. ANDERS FUNG ET AL Case Number: | | CGC24613243 | Case Title: | | AMERICAN FUND MANAGEMENT ONE LP, A CALIFORNIA VS. ANDERS FUNG ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-07-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Third Amended Complaint | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 7, 2026.

Line 1. PLAINTIFF AMERICAN BAY AREA FUND MANAGEMENT LLC, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File Third Amended Complaint is CONTINUED to August 5, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share