DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
cl26-01511·solano·Civil·Civil Dispute
Hearing about 2 months agoMOOT

SCHRUPP v. KUNDU

Demurrer to (Initial) Complaint

Hearing date
Jul 7, 2026
Department
THREE
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSCHRUPP
DefendantKUNDU

Ruling

DEPARTMENT THREE JUDGE STEPHEN GIZZI 707-207-7303 TENTATIVE RULINGS SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, JULY 7, 2026

The parties may appear via Zoom with the exception of trials, trial management conferences, order for examinations and mandatory settlement conferences. The information for the Zoom meeting is set forth below.

The tentative ruling shall become the ruling of the court unless a party desiring to be heard contacts the judicial assistant of the department hearing the matter by 4:30 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing, and further advises that such party has notified the other side of its intention to request a hearing. A party requesting a hearing must notify all parties of the request to be heard by 4:30.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. v. CALUAG Case No. CL25-07810

Motion for Order That Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts Be Deemed Admitted

TENTATIVE RULING

Plaintiff’s unopposed Motion for Order That Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts Be Deemed Admitted is GRANTED. The court will sign Plaintiff’s proposed order.

No sanctions were requested nor are they imposed.

SCHRUPP v. KUNDU Case No. cl26-01511

Demurrer to (Initial) Complaint

TENTATIVE RULING

With Plaintiff’s timely filing of the first amended complaint under C.C.P. §472(a), the Defendant’s demurrer to the initial complaint is moot.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share