DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF25519497·sf·Civil·Petition to Compel Arbitration
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

IN RE: BRIGITTE STRAIN

Notice Of Second Amended Petition And Petition For Order To Compel Arbitration (Ccp 1281 Et Seq.)

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 30, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerBRIGITTE STRAIN

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF25519497 - July 2, 2026 Hearing date: July 2, 2026 Case number: CPF25519497 Case title: IN RE: BRIGITTE STRAIN Case Number: | | CPF25519497 | Case Title: | | IN RE: BRIGITTE STRAIN | Court Date: | | 2026-07-02 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Second Amended Petition And Petition For Order To Compel Arbitration (Ccp 1281 Et Seq.) | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for July 2, 2026. Line 1. PETITIONER BRIGITTE STRAIN Notice Of Second Amended Petition And Petition For Order To Compel Arbitration (Ccp 1281 Et Seq.) is CONTINUED to July 30, 2026 on the Court's own motion. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share