DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25627205·sf·Civil·Discovery
Hearing about 2 months agoCONTINUED

WILLIAM L. VEEN, P.C., FKA THE VEEN FIRM, P.C., A VS. ELINOR LEARY ET AL

Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Interrogatories (Set One); Motion for Sanctions

Hearing date
Jul 2, 2026
Department
301
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 10, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWILLIAM L. VEEN, P.C., FKA THE VEEN FIRM, P.C.
DefendantELINOR LEARY

Ruling

Matter on calendar for Thursday, July 02, 2026, Line 9, PLAINTIFF WILLIAM L. VEEN, P.C., FKA THE VEEN FIRM, P.C.'s Motion To Compel Further Responses To Special Interrogatories (Set One). (Complete tentative ruling e-mailed to the parties).

1 - Plaintiff William L. Veen, P.C.'s motion to compel defendant Elinor Leary to make further responses to its special interrogatories, set one, and for sanctions, is continued for further hearing to August 10, 2026. The parties are ordered to meet and confer telephonically or in person about the supplemental responses served by Leary after this motion was filed.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA). | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share