| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
DEMURRER to COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679571 - March 11, 2026 Hearing date: March 11, 2026 Case number: CUD25679571 Case title: OCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL VS. MILTON RENE HUEZO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679571 | Case Title: | | OCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL VS. MILTON RENE HUEZO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-11 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for March 11, 2026. Line 5.
DEFENDANT CARMEN SORIANO, AN INDIVIDUAL, JORGE SOLORZANO DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit did not specify either the date when the notice period commenced or when it ended. Particularly, the Notice appears to have provided the date it was signed, but not when it was served, which commenced the three-day period. (Eshagian v. Cepeda (2025) 112 Cal.App.5th 433.) This defect cannot be cured by amendment. As this issue is dispositive, the Court does not reach the other issues raised by the demurrer.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge.=(505/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.