DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25631020·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
CONTINUED

AIMEE GEORGE VS. OHAGAN MEYER ET AL

Amended Notice Of Motion And Special Motion To Strike Complaint And Causes Of Action Therein Pursuant To Cal. Civ. Proc. Section 425.16 [Anti-Slapp]

Hearing date
Mar 4, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Mar 27, 2026

Motion type

Anti-SLAPP Motion

Parties

PlaintiffAIMEE GEORGE
DefendantOHAGAN MEYER ET AL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25631020 - March 4, 2026 Hearing date: March 4, 2026 Case number: CGC25631020 Case title: AIMEE GEORGE VS. OHAGAN MEYER ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25631020 | Case Title: | | AIMEE GEORGE VS. OHAGAN MEYER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-03-04 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Amended Notice Of Motion And Special Motion To Strike Complaint And Causes Of Action Therein Pursuant To Cal. Civ. Proc. Section 425.16 [Anti-Slapp] | Rulings: | | Real Property / Housing Court Law and Motion calendar for March 4, 2026, line 6.

Defendant's Special Motion to Strike is continued to March 27, 2026. No later than March 13, 2026 Plaintiff to file an opposition compliant with CRC 3.1113. Opposition filed on February 13, 2026 is stricken. If Plaintiff fails to file a proper opposition as stated above, this motion will be treated as unopposed. Defendant may file a reply by March 20, 2026. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share