PETITION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
Conservatorship of Seth Daniel Mata 21PR000108
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review - Biennial hearing in two years, on July 06, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservatorship of Patsy Ann Mallmann 24PR000299
[1] FIRST ACCOUNT AND REPORT OF CONSERVATOR; PETITION FOR ALLOWANCE OF FEES TO CONSERVATOR OF PERSON AND ESTATE AND ATTORNEY FOR CONSERVATOR
[2] REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed. After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the matter is set for a Review – Biennial and for an Accounting in two years on July 06, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. All accounting documents must be filed at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
In the Matter of the Andrew J. Lipnosky Irrevocable Trust 26-59329
PETITION FOR ORDER TO TERMINATE THE TRUST AND DISTRIBUTE ITS ASSETS TO THE BENEFICIARY
TENTATIVE RULING: The Petition is GRANTED.
**at 9:00 a.m.** Conservatorship of Jerome Darnell Wilson 26MH000095
PETITION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE
TENTATIVE RULING: Good cause appearing and no oppositions being on file, the petition for change of venue is GRANTED. The case is set for a review hearing on September 3, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B, at the Napa County Superior Court. The hearing is to confirm receipt of the notification from the Sacramento County Superior Court that it has received the transferred case. (Prob. Code, § 2217 [requiring a review hearing within two months]; Welf. &
Inst. Code § 5350 [stating that procedures for LPS conservatorships shall be the same as that provided for probate conservatorships with certain exceptions not relevant here].)
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The conservator is instructed to contact the Civil Filing Division at the Napa County Superior Court to initiate transfer and pay, subject to any applicable fee waiver, the: (1) transfer fees from the Napa County Superior Court; and (2) the filing fee for the Sacramento County Superior Court.
Once initiated by Conservator, the clerk is directed to transmit to the clerk of the court in Sacramento County a certified or exemplified copy of this order, together with all papers in the proceeding on file. (Id., § 2216, subd. (a).)
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Charles J Berry v. Pope Valley Elementary 19CV000733 Unified School District et al
DEFENDANT POPE VALLEY UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT’S MOTION TO COMPEL SUBPOENA COMPLIANCE
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is GRANTED. The Commission is ordered to produce, within 30 days of this ruling, the responsive documents identified on its privilege log, attached as Exhibit E to the Declaration of Joseph A. Halabrin, but only to the extent they disclose (1) any statements, arguments, and/or other evidence proffered by Plaintiff in connection with the administrative hearing before the Commission, or (2) the general procedural process employed for the hearing. The Commission is entitled to redact any information it contends is protected by third-party privacy rights, attorney work product, attorney-client privilege, or the deliberative process privilege. The Commission’s production shall be accompanied by an amended privilege log to identify the documents withheld and/or redactions made.
To the extent Defendant disagrees with the Commission’s redactions or continued withholding of documents, it is directed to meet and confer with the Commission in a good faith effort to informally resolve the dispute. The meet and confer efforts shall include consideration of a protective order to address any confidentiality/privacy concerns by the Commission. Only once those efforts are exhausted may Defendant file a subsequent motion to compel compliance, outlining in a detailed declaration its meet and confer efforts.
Defendant shall provide Notice of Entry of Order.
The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in
3