Order to Show Cause
7. Guardianship of Delilah L. Rutherford, Darrian M. Rutherford, Donovan E. Rutherford 25PR00003 Order to Show Cause
TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The Order to Show Cause filed June 12, 2026, is vacated. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on June 1, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.
8. Guardianship of Gabriel A Castro Ochoa 25PR00065 Case Management Conference
TENTATIVE RULING: No appearances required. The required document has been received and reviewed. The matter is set for the next annual Case Management Conference at 9:00 a.m. on July 6, 2027, in Department 61 for review of compliance with the filing of the Confidential Guardianship Status Report (Judicial Council Form GC-251). If a completed GC-251 has been filed in a timely fashion prior to the court date, appearances will be waived.
9. Guardianship of Yonatan Alberto Perez Rivas 25PR00081 Case Management Conference
TENTATIVE RULING:
No appearances required. The Court acknowledges the Guardianship Status Report filed on May 13, 2026, as well as the Court Investigator memo filed June 24, 2026. The Guardian is to cure the deficiencies in the filed status report as described in the Court Investigator memo. The case is continued one month to August 4, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 61 for proof of compliance with the order to cure the deficiencies. If the Guardian has at that time filed an amended GC-251 or a verified declaration providing the required information, an appearance will be waived, and a new hearing date shall be set for one year out for the filing of the annual Status Report.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”