Edgar Daniel Alvarez; Karla Bautista v. Junior Gomez; Timothy McGee; Armando Ramirez; Sergio Ramirez; Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.; Target Corporation

To access a tentative ruling, move your cursor over the line number, hold down the “Control” key and click. If you see last week’s tentative rulings, you have checked prior to the posting of the current week’s tentative rulings. You will need to either “REFRESH” or “QUIT” your browser and reopen it. Another suggestion is to “clean the cache” of your browser. Finally, you may have to switch browsers. If you fail to do any of these, your browser may pull up old information from old cookies even after the tentative rulings have been posted.

This Court's tentative ruling is just that—tentative. Trial courts are not bound by their tentative rulings, which are superseded by the final order. (See Faulkinbury v. Boyd & Associates, Inc. (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1363, 1374-1375.) The tentative ruling allows a party to focus his or her arguments at a subsequent hearing and to attempt to convince the Court the tentative should or should not become the Court's final order. (Cowan v. Krayzman (2011) 196 Cal.App.4th 907, 917.) If you wish to challenge a tentative ruling, please refer to a specific portion of the tentative ruling to which you disagree.

LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING

LINE 1 24CV440808 Edgar Daniel Alvarez; Karla Bautista v. Junior Motion of Defendant Target Corporation to Compel Gomez; Timothy McGee; Armando Ramirez; Plaintiffs to Provide Further Responses to Special Sergio Ramirez; Sedgwick Claims Management Interrogatories, Set Two, and Request to Production of Services, Inc.; Target Corporation Documents, Sets Three, and for Monetary Sanctions. OFF CALENDAR.

LINE 2 24CV444353 Stacy Kimball; Tammy Silva v. Kim Huynh Motion of Defendant Kim Huynh to Compel Plaintiff Tammy Silva to Provide Further Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two, and Request to Production of Documents, Set Three, and for Monetary Sanctions. The motion appears to be unopposed. The motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff Tammy Silva is to provide answers to the foregoing discovery requests within 10 days of the filing and service of this order. Objections are deemed WAIVED. Defendant makes a request for monetary sanctions. The request is not code-compliant and is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a formal motion requesting sanctions. SEE ATTACHED TENTATIVE RULING. By appearing on a contested tentative ruling, you will be presumed to have read the Bannerhead at the top of this Tentative Ruling Page and the paragraph on “Civility.”