| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
DEMURRER to COMPLAINT
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD26680969 - February 25, 2026 Hearing date: February 25, 2026 Case number: CUD26680969 Case title: SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST VS. MIGUEL ANGEL MARTINEZ FALCON ET AL Case Number: | | CUD26680969 | Case Title: | | SAN FRANCISCO COMMUNITY LAND TRUST VS. MIGUEL ANGEL MARTINEZ FALCON ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-25 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 25, 2026. Line 18.
DEFENDANT AUDILIO POLANCO DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, 5 days to answer. Complaint states a cause of action for unlawful detainer under CCP 1161(4). Moving party failed to show that violation of SF Administrative Code 37.3(c)does not constitute illegal use or unlawful purpose; and is a mere ancillary legal violation unrelated to the functional purpose of the property.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.