DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25678451·sf·Civil·Real Property / Housing
Hearing Requited.

MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL

2nd Amended Motion To Vacate Entry Of Default And Default Judgment

Hearing date
Feb 25, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffMICHAEL YANCEY
DefendantIDRIS PIPPINS

Attorneys

Brial Skarbekfor Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678451 - February 25, 2026 Hearing date: February 25, 2026 Case number: CUD25678451 Case title: MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678451 | Case Title: | | MICHAEL YANCEY VS. IDRIS PIPPINS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-25 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | 2nd Amended Motion To Vacate Entry Of Default And Default Judgment | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 25, 2026. Line 9. DEFENDANT IDRIS PIPPINS 2nd Amended Motion To Vacate Entry Of Default And Default Judgment Hearing Requited. Brial Skarbek. Esq., to be present in-person in Court to address UD-101. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share