STEPHEN KAVANAUGH VS. DOUGLASS MANOR HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL
DEMURRER
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF25519156 - February 19, 2026 Hearing date: February 19, 2026 Case number: CPF25519156 Case title: STEPHEN KAVANAUGH VS. DOUGLASS MANOR HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL Case Number: | | CPF25519156 | Case Title: | | STEPHEN KAVANAUGH VS. DOUGLASS MANOR HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 19, 2026.
Line 1.1. DEFENDANTS' DEMURRER is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part.
Demurrer to causes of action for declaratory relief against the association is sustained with leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege all violations under one cause of action.
Demurrer to the causes of action for declaratory relief against individual defendants is sustained with leave to amend for Plaintiff to allege in good faith facts giving rise to a declaratory relief claim against these individual defendants.
Demurrer is otherwise overruled.
Nothing on the face of the complaint indicates that the request for relief under CC 5145 is moot.
Declaration of Arthur Kegels is stricken.
Improper on a demurrer.
Request for Judicial Notice is denied.
=(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.