| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Verified Petition For Writ Of Mandate, Ccp Section 1085, Requiring Court Clerk To Enter City's Default
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC22601288 - February 19, 2026 Hearing date: February 19, 2026 Case number: CGC22601288 Case title: MIHAL EMBERTON VS. SAN FRANCISCO CITY GOVERMENT Case Number: | | CGC22601288 | Case Title: | | MIHAL EMBERTON VS. SAN FRANCISCO CITY GOVERMENT | Court Date: | | 2026-02-19 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Verified Petition For Writ Of Mandate, Ccp Section 1085, Requiring Court Clerk To Enter City?S Default | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 19, 2026. Line 2.1.
PLAINTIFF MIHAL EMBERTON Verified Petition For Writ Of Mandate, Ccp Section 1085, Requiring Court Clerk To Enter City's Default is DENIED.
Defendant responded to the operative pleading, the Eighth Amended Complaint, by filing a demurrer, and the matter was heard on the merits after full briefing. Plaintiff did not move to strike the demurrer, and the time to do so has now expired. Any objection to the timing of Defendant's filing of the demurrer is thus waived. As the demurrer is currently under submission, further response by Defendant to the Eighth Amended Complaint is neither required nor appropriate at this time.M =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.