Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Set One
Browse all Motion to Compel Further Responses rulings statewide →
Stanislaus County - Civil - https://www.stanislaus.courts.ca.gov/online-services/tentative-rulings/civil-tentati ve-rulings Civil Tentative Rulings June 30, 2026
The following are the tentative ruling for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21:
CV-25-003106 - CHAVEZ, MARIANNE MORALES vs FORD MOTOR COMPANY - Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, Set One - HEARING REQUIRED.
The Court wants to discuss the application of Code of Civil Procedure section 871.26 to this matter. I reject Ford's view that the mediation was not completed because Plaintiff was not personally present. I want to know the terms of the group mediation and how the cases were grouped. Ford's failure to respond entirely does not appear to disable me from hearing this motion. If we get past that issue, I am likely to order a further meet and confer on the merits of the individual discovery disputes.
CV-25-006106 - BANK OF AMERICA NA vs GONZALEZ, CRYSTAL M - Plaintiff's Motion for Order that Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts be Deemed Admitted - GRANTED and unopposed.
On April 22, 2026, Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. submitted a motion for order that matters in request for admission of truth of facts be deemed admitted. Plaintiff states that it propounded requests for admissions on Defendant and received no response "If a party to whom requests for admission are directed fails to serve a timely response . . . [t]he requesting party may move for an order that the genuineness of any documents and the truth of any matters specified in the requests be deemed admitted[.]" (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 2033.280.) "The court shall make this order, unless it finds that the party to whom the requests for admission have been directed has served, before the hearing on the motion, a proposed response to the requests for admission that is in substantial compliance with Section 2033.220." (Code Civ. Proc., Sec. 2033.280(c).) The motion is granted.
CV-25-006462 - JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA vs STORLIE, CARRIE - Plaintiff's Motion for Order that Matters in Request for Admission of Truth of Facts be Deemed Admitted - HEARING REQUIRED.
On April 22, 2026, Plaintiff submitted the instant motion. On June 23, 2026, Defendant submitted proof of service of Defendant's opposition to the motion but the Court was unable to locate an opposition brief in the court file and requires the parties' assistance.
CV-26-000086 - BRADFORD, PATTI vs KELLERMEYER BERGENSONS SERVICES LLC - a) Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Decision on Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings- HEARING REQUIRED. b) Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and to Stay Proceedings - HEARING REQUIRED. c) Defendant Amazon.Com Services LLC's Joinder to Kellermeyer Bergensons Services, LLC's and Chio Saechao's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings - HEARING REQUIRED.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
I requested a declaration to explain why the opposition was not filed timely. I do not appear to have it and have questions. .
The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22:
***There are no tentative rulings in Department 22***
The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Clifford Tong in Department 23:
CV-24-008187 - GUILLEN, CLAUDIA vs BELMARE SENIOR LIVING LLC - a) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant Belmare Senior Living LLC to Provide Further Responses to Requests for Admissions, Set One and to Have Requests Nos. 4, 6, 20, 24-33 Deemed Admitted Against Defendant Belmare Senior Living LLC;