DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25679228·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
OFF CALENDAR

ZHUO DONG LIN VS. KAREN DER-CHEN HAO ET AL

Motion To Vacate Default And Default Judgment As Void Ab Initio

Hearing date
Feb 17, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffZHUO DONG LIN
DefendantKAREN DER-CHEN HAO
DefendantLILIAN FENG

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679228 - February 17, 2026 Hearing date: February 17, 2026 Case number: CUD25679228 Case title: ZHUO DONG LIN VS. KAREN DER-CHEN HAO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679228 | Case Title: | | ZHUO DONG LIN VS. KAREN DER-CHEN HAO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-02-17 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion To Vacate Default And Default Judgment As Void Ab Initio | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for February 18, 2026. Line 3.

DEFENDANT LILIAN FENG, KAREN HAO Motion To Vacate Default And Default Judgment As Void Ab Initio is OFF CALENDAR. Insufficient notice per CCP 1005(b). There is no order authorizing this motion to be heard on shortened time. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share