Nystul vs. Airborne Systems North America of CA, Inc.

8 Morrissey vs. Min

2022-01285505 Motion for an Order Appointing Matthew L. Taylor as Partition Referee

Plaintiff Marcia Morrissey’s unopposed motion for an order appointing Matthew L. Taylor as partition referee is granted.

On or about 7/21/25, the Court entered an Interlocutory Judgment stating that, “a qualified and bonded referee, who name shall be provided by Plaintiff, will be appointed for the purpose of managing, maintaining, and selling the Real Property.” (ROA 97.) By this motion, Plaintiff proposes the appointment of Matthew L. Taylor, a licensed attorney. (ROA 105.)

Among other qualifications and experience, Mr. Taylor attests he has “served as Receiver, Judge Pro Tem, Partition Referee and Special Master for the California Superior Court System” and has “worked directly as the Receiver and a Receiver’s agent, supervising day-today operations of properties and companies in receivership...” (Taylor Decl. at ¶¶ 2-3, Exh. A.) In his capacity as “both Receiver and Partition Referee [he has] sold dozens of real properties for the court system in the past few years” and is “currently either Receiver or Referee in more than 10 matters with several properties currently listed for private sale under court supervision.” (Taylor Decl. at ¶ 5.)

Further, Mr. Taylor attests that he is “not a party to this action,” does “not represent any parties to this action,” and is “not related to any judge of the Court by consanguinity or affinity within the third degree.” He does “not personally know any of the parties in this action.” (Taylor Decl. at ¶ 8.) Thus, the Court finds Mr. Taylor is not ineligible to serve as partition referee for the subject real property. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 873.050.)

Plaintiff shall give notice of the ruling.

9 Nystul vs. Airborne Systems North America of CA, Inc. Motions to Compel Depos

Withdrawn

2024-01374494

10 Perez vs. TY Caldwell, DDS and Susan Caldwell, DDS

2025-01463289 Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

The motion by Cameron D. Coy of the Law Offices of Cameron D. Coy, to be relieved as counsel of record for J Um DDS Cypress, Inc., is granted.

Upon the signing of the order, counsel shall serve the signed order on the client and all parties that have appeared. Cameron D. Coy of the Law Offices of Cameron D. Coy will be relieved as counsel of record for J Um DDS Cypress, Inc., effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the signed order upon the client and all parties.

The Law Offices of Cameron D. Coy shall give notice of the ruling.

OSC re. Representation of J Um DDS Cypress, Inc. is set 7-20-26 at 9:00 a.m.

11 Sitta, Paige & Associates, Inc. vs. Creative Installations, Inc.

2025-01477302 1. Motion to Compel Answers to Form Interrogatories2. Motion to Compel Production Motion to Compel Responses to Form Interrogatories Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Production of Documents

The unopposed motions by Plaintiff Sitta, Paige & Associates, Inc. dba Paige Floor Covering Specialists (“Plaintiff”) for an order compelling Defendant Creative Solutions, Inc. (“Creative”) to serve responses to Plaintiff’s form interrogatories, set one, and request for production of documents, set one, are GRANTED.

Applicable legal authority A propounding party may move for an order compelling responses to interrogatories at any time “[i]f a party to whom interrogatories are directed fails to serve a timely response.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (b).) By failing to serve timely responses, Defendant waived “any right to exercise the option to produce writings under Section 2030.230, as well as any objection to the interrogatories, including one based on privilege or on the protection for work product.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290, subd. (a).)

All that need be shown in the moving papers is that a set of interrogatories was properly served on the opposing party, that the