ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. CARLOS CANO ET AL
Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD24677224 - January 28, 2026 Hearing date: January 28, 2026 Case number: CUD24677224 Case title: ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. CARLOS CANO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD24677224 | Case Title: | | ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP VS. CARLOS CANO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-28 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 28, 2026. Line 12. PLAINTIFF ESSEX FOX PLAZA, LP Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation
Hearing required regarding (1) whether Defendant Cano has vacated the premises; and (2) any evidence of Defendant Cano's alleged additional payment referenced in Paragraph 7 of his declaration.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(505/MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.