| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Compel Defendant 35 Casa Way Llcs Responses To Special Interrogatories (Set Two), And Request For Monetary Sanctions
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday, January 28, 2026, Line 6 1 - Plaintiff Ferdinand Cahayag's unopposed Motion to Compel Defendant 35 Casa Way LLC's Responses to Special Interrogatories, Set Two and Request for Sanctions is GRANTED.
The discovery requests at issue appear reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2017.010.) Defendant has not established that it has provided any responses to the interrogatories. Defendant's failure to timely respond is not excused. No meet and confer requirement exists for motions to compel responses for Interrogatories when no responses have been provided. (Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290.)
Defendant shall serve verified, objection-free, substantive responses to Plaintiff's Form Interrogatories, Set One no later than 10 court days after notice of this order. The court does not find Defendant 35 Casa Way LLC acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery. Defendant 35 Casa Way LLC shall pay to Plaintiff Ferdinand Cahayag, through counsel, $1,060 as sanctions, payment no later than 15 court days after notice of this order. (See Code of Civil Procedure sections 2023.010, 2023.030, 2030.290(c).)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.