DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC25622004·sf·Civil·Real Property
GRANTED

HSH HOLDING LLC VS. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File A Cross-Complaint

Hearing date
Jan 23, 2026
Department
501
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffHSH HOLDING LLC
DefendantAMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY
DefendantVESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC.

Attorneys

G. David Rubinfor Defendant

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622004 - January 23, 2026 Hearing date: January 23, 2026 Case number: CGC25622004 Case title: HSH HOLDING LLC VS. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622004 | Case Title: | | HSH HOLDING LLC VS. AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-23 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File A Cross-Complaint; Memorandum Of Point And Authorities; Declaration Of G. David Rubin | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 23, 2026. Line 6.

DEFENDANT VESTA ASSET MANAGEMENT, INC. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO File A Cross-Complaint; is GRANTED. No opposition filed. Cross-Complaint to be filed and served forthwith.(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share