| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Date |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680070 - January 20, 2026 Hearing date: January 20, 2026 Case number: CUD25680070 Case title: 516 ELLIS I7, LP VS. RAYMOND WILLIAMS ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680070 | Case Title: | | 516 ELLIS I7, LP VS. RAYMOND WILLIAMS ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 20, 2026. Line 7.2.
PLAINTIFF 516 ELLIS I7, LP Notice Of Motion And Motion For Order That The Truth Of Matters Be Deemed Admitted is OFF CALENDAR.
All moving papers must be served on each party who has appeared in this action. Proofs of service indicate each Defendant was served with the moving papers for only one of two motions filed for this date. The Court notes that where multiple motions are filed with identical titles for all supporting papers, proofs of service which do not otherwise differentiate do not adequately reflect which documents were served. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.