DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CUD25679571·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
GRANTED

OCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL VS. MILTON RENE HUEZO ET AL

MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS

Hearing date
Jan 14, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Motion to Quash

Parties

PlaintiffOCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL
DefendantMILTON RENE HUEZO
DefendantCARMEN SORIANO
DefendantJORGE SOLORZANO

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679571 - January 14, 2026 Hearing date: January 14, 2026 Case number: CUD25679571 Case title: OCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL VS. MILTON RENE HUEZO ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679571 | Case Title: | | OCEAN INVESTMENT COMPANY, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL VS. MILTON RENE HUEZO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | REAL PROPERTY/HOUSING MOTIONS CALENDAR | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 14, 2026 line 12.

DEFENDANTS CARMEN SORIANO AND JORGE SOLORZANO'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS is GRANTED, subject to opposition, as follows: (1) any purported personal service on Defendant Carmen Soriano prior to January 5, 2026 is quashed; (2) any purported substituted service on any other defendant by leaving a copy with Defendant Carmen Soriano prior to January 5, 2026 is quashed; (3) any purported personal service on Defendant Jorge Solorzano prior to December 29, 2025 is quashed; (4) any purported substituted service on any other defendant by leaving a copy with Defendant Jorge Solorzano prior to December 29, 2025 is quashed; and (5) any purported service by posting and mailing absent a court order authorizing such service is quashed.

As Plaintiff has not yet filed a proof of service of summons, this order is limited and does not extend to any potential service other than those described above.

This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT)

Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Video Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666; Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share