GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL
Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation
Motion type
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678188 - January 14, 2026 Hearing date: January 14, 2026 Case number: CUD25678188 Case title: GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678188 | Case Title: | | GEARY COURTYARD 639 LLC VS. ADAM CHARLES BARNETT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Motion For Entry Of Judgment Pursuant To Stipulation | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 14, 2026 line 7.
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO STIPULATION. Hearing required regarding (1) the status of Defendant's rental assistance application and employment; (2) any legal authority for Plaintiff's request for a monetary judgment in excess of $35,000 in this limited jurisdiction case; and (3) what section of the Stipulation authorizes Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees where the Complaint does not pray for this relief and there is no declaration of counsel filed in support.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Video Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666; Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.