DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CGC23611334·sf·Civil·Discovery
GRANTED

ARKADY BERGER ET AL VS. DAVID DEDIA ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Deem Request For Admissions (Set One) To Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia, Admitted; Request For Monetary Sanctions Of $1,160.00

Hearing date
Jan 14, 2026
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Motion to Compel Discovery

Monetary amounts referenced

$1,160.00$710

Parties

PlaintiffArkady Berger
PlaintiffNelly Merzheitsky
DefendantDavid Dedia
DefendantOlga Jelkovsky Dedia

Attorneys

Heather A. Tovarfor Plaintiff

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Wednesday January 14, 2026, Line 3. 1 - Plaintiffs Arkady Berger and Nelly Merzheitsky's unopposed Motion to Deem Request for Admissions (Set One) to Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia Admitted; Request For Monetary Sanctions Of $1,160.00 is GRANTED.

The record demonstrates Plaintiffs properly served Requests for Admission, Set One and Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia did not provide any responses to Plaintiffs' requests. (See Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.280.) Defendant's failure to timely respond is not excused. No meet and confer requirement attaches when no responses have been provided. Plaintiffs' RFAs, Set One, served on Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia, dated October 29, 2025, are deemed admitted.

The record does not demonstrate Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia acted with substantial justification in connection with this discovery. Defendant Olga Jelkovsky Dedia is ordered to pay to Plaintiffs Arkady Berger and Nelly Merzheitsky $710 in sanctions, payable by February 10, 2025.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/JMQ) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share