LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL
Notice Of Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Serivice Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25680543 - January 7, 2026 Hearing date: January 7, 2026 Case number: CUD25680543 Case title: LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25680543 | Case Title: | | LEGALLET PROPERTIES, LLC, DBA BAYVIEW INDUSTRIAL VS. JERRY CALDWELL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Serivice Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise; Memorandum | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 7, 2026. Line 19. DEFENDANT JERRY CALDWELL Motion For Order Quashing Alleged Serivice Of Summons And Vacating Default And Void Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction And/Or Based On Surprise; Hearing required.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. Defendant Jerry Caldwell and process server Manuel Lanuza are ordered to appear in person or via Zoom with video capabilities. (MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Video - Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666; Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.