ONNA HUI ET AL VS. ROBERT MOFFATT ET AL
DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679439 - January 7, 2026 Hearing date: January 7, 2026 Case number: CUD25679439 Case title: ONNA HUI ET AL VS. ROBERT MOFFATT ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679439 | Case Title: | | ONNA HUI ET AL VS. ROBERT MOFFATT ET AL | Court Date: | | 2026-01-07 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for January 7, 2026. Line 17.
DEFENDANT ROBERT MOFFATT, QINGKAI GUI, ZHIXUAN LIU DEMURRER to 2ND Amended COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. The Notice to Terminate Tenancy provides erroneous and conflicting contact information for the San Francisco Rent Board, which obscures the information required by section 37.9(c) of the San Francisco Rent Ordinance such that the Notice does not sufficiently provide the tenants with notice of this information. This defect cannot be cured by amendment, and the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend on this ground only.
Defendants' repeated request for judicial notice of Exhibits 3 and 4 is denied, as the Court previously indicated that these documents are not properly subject to judicial notice under Evidence Code 452, and Defendants' repeated request offers no new authority for any contrary conclusion.
This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. (MT)
Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom (Video - Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666; Passcode: 872834). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.