DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CIVSB2505908·sanbernardino·Civil·Breach of Contract
GRANTED

L.A. Commercial Group, Inc., v. TBC Group Inc.

Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement Pursuant to CCP § 664.6

Hearing date
May 6, 2026
Department
S-17
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Other

Causes of action

Breach of Settlement Agreement

Monetary amounts referenced

$13,148.59$60.00$400.00$13,608.59

Parties

PlaintiffL.A. Commercial Group, Inc.
DefendantTBC Group Inc.

Ruling

15. L.A. Commercial Group, Inc., v. TBC Group Inc., Case No. CIVSB2505908 Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement Pursuant to CCP § 664.6 5/6/26, 9:00 a.m., Dept. S-17

The Court would GRANT this unopposed motion. Plaintiff has established a signed settlement agreement enforceable pursuant to Section 664.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure. It further set forth breach of the payment plan entered into by the parties. Defendant shall pay in the amount of $13,148.59, plus costs of $60.00, and attorneys’ fees in the amount of $400.00, for a total Judgment of $13,608.59, in favor of Plaintiff.

*** *** ***

16. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Sanchez, Case No. CIVSB2528608 Plaintiff’s Motion to Deem Requests for Admission, Set One, as Admitted 5/6/26, 9:00 a.m., Dept. S-17

The Court would GRANT this unopposed motion. In support of the motion, Plaintiff’s counsel states that on November 20, 2025, his office served Defendant with Plaintiff’s Requests for Admissions, Set One, (RFA1), by mail. (Lopez Decl., ¶¶2- 3 & Exh. 1 [RFA1s with Proof of Service].) No responses have been received. (Lopez Decl., ¶¶4- 5.) Thus, the Court would grant the motion and deem the RFA1s as admitted.

*** *** ***

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share