DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CIVSB2221628·sanbernardino·Civil·Discovery
CONTINUED

Ying Zhao v. Hong Yan Li

Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One

Hearing date
May 4, 2026
Department
R17
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jun 17, 2026

Motion type

Motion to Compel Discovery

Parties

PlaintiffYing Zhao
DefendantHong Yan Li

Ruling

2. CASE NUMBER CASE NAME TYPE OF HEARING CIVSB2221628 Ying Zhao v. Hong Yan Li Defendant Hong Yan Li’s Morion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set One Tentative Ruling:

Defendant filed a Motion to Compel responses to Form Interrogatories Set One on December 23, 2025 and the motion was set for hearing on March 26, 2026. Thereafter, there were multiple continuances on the Court’s own motion but notice of the new dates was given to Plaintiff’s former attorney, who was relieved as her attorney on October 22, 2025. As a result, the court is concerned that Plaintiff may not have notice of this hearing date. Therefore, the Court continues this motion to June 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department R17.

The Court, on its own motion, vacates the TRC and trial dates and sets a Trial Setting Conference for June 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department R17.

Defendant is ordered to give notice to Plaintiff.

3. CASE NUMBER CASE NAME TYPE OF HEARING CIVSB2221628 Ying Zhao v. Hong Yan Li Defendant Hong Yan Li’s Morion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to Form Interrogatories, Set Two Tentative Ruling:

Defendant filed a Motion to Compel responses to Form Interrogatories Set Two on December 23, 2025 and the motion was set for hearing on March 26, 2026. Thereafter, there were multiple continuances on the Court’s own motion but notice of the new dates was given to Plaintiff’s former attorney, who was relieved as her attorney on October 22, 2025. As a result, the court is concerned that Plaintiff may not have notice of this hearing date. Therefore, the Court continues this motion to June 17, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. in Department R17.

Defendant is ordered to give notice to Plaintiff.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share