R. VS ROBLOX CORPORATION
APPLICATION OF STEVEN L. VANDERPORTEN TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE AS TO ROBLOX CORPORATION
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME IN RE: 6497 SAN DIEGO MOTION TO DISBURSE SURPLUS CVMV2511599 AVENUE, RIVERSIDE, PROCEEDS FROM TRUSTEE CA 92506 SALE Tentative Ruling:
Hearing to be conducted per Court’s Ruling of April 10, 2026.
2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME APPLICATION OF STEVEN L. R. VS ROBLOX VANDERPORTEN TO APPEAR
CORPORATION PRO HAC VICE AS TO ROBLOX CORPORATION Tentative Ruling:
Application of Steven L. Vanderporten to Appear Pro Hac Vice as Plaintiffs’ Attorney is GRANTED.
3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME APPLICATION OF MELISSA H. R. VS ROBLOX NAFASH TO APPEAR PRO HAC
CORPORATION VICE AS TO ROBLOX CORPORATION Tentative Ruling:
Application of Melissa H. Nafash to Appear Pro Hac Vice as Plaintiffs’ Attorney is GRANTED.
4. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA HEARING ON PRELIMINARY CVRI2601511 VS TOBACCO ISLAND INJUNCTION PLUS Tentative Ruling:
Hearing to be conducted. Appearances Required.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.