DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
PR19-00024·plumas·Civil·Guardianship
Court intends to continue the guardianship upon further information from Guardians.

Guardianship of Johnson, Cianna Maureen

Continue the guardianship

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
Two
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Other

Parties

RespondentJohnson, Cianna Maureen

Ruling

Case No. PR24-00040 Estate of Schake, Charles William

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Counsel to update court re: states of the administration.

Case No. PR22-00021 Estate of Whalen, Robert Jack

Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Required: Absent objection, court will grant petition and sign proposed order.

Case No. PR21-00015 Guardianship of Alcaraz, Elisandra Jaurgui

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardians ordered to appear.

Case No. PR21-00009 Guardianship of Ballantine, Jed

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Guardians ordered to appear.

Case No. PR19-00024 Guardianship of Johnson, Cianna Maureen

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Court intends to continue the guardianship upon further information from Guardians. GC-251 received, set Bi-annual review 5/08/2028.

LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – 9:30 a.m.

Case No. CV23-00203 Cohoon, Ben C. et al vs. Indian Valley Forests, LLC

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Hearing on Motion for Leave to Amend. Court will hear argument re: timeliness of motion.

Case No. LC25-00283 Plumas County – Dept of Facilities and Airports vs. Sih, Phil

Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Motion to “Restore” is denied. Motion to enforce judgment will be partially granted. Defendant shall file a declaration in support of Attorney’s Fees request. Plaintiff may file to tax costs if so desired.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share