Dew, Justin Alexander et al vs. Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), County of Plumas, State of California et al
Trial setting
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Case No. PR24-00011 Guardianship of Jones, Hayleigh.
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: GC-251 required.
Case No. 27031M Resurgence Financial LLC vs. Edwards, Sharon L et al
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Dye to clerical error, OSC was not issued by court.
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1:30 p.m.
Case No. LC25-00263 Cal-Sierra Title Company vs. Chase Family Enterprises, LLC et al
Tentative Ruling: No Appearance Required: Matter is off calendar.
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES 2:00 p.m.
Case No. LC25-00210 Barclays Bank Deleware vs. Hill, Scott
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: OSC hearing. OSC is withdrawn.
Case No. CV25-00176 Brennan, Suzanne v. Lepage, Jarrett
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Parties have mediation scheduled. Matter to be continued to 8/10/26 at 2:00pm for status of mediation, and setting if necessary.
Case No. LC25-00212 Crown Asset Management, LLC vs. Rush, Charla
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Defendant has not filed responsive pleadings. Plaintiff to update court as to status of default.
Case No. CV23-00264 Dew, Justin Alexander et al vs. Department of Transportation (CALTRANS), County of Plumas, State of California et al
Tentative Ruling: Appearance Required: Matter to be set on 6/22/26 at 2:00pm for trial setting. Counsel for plaintiff to appear, court will not accept appearance attorney.
3
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.