Conservatorship of Horner, Karson
Annual review
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Tentative Rulings Law & Motion and Family Law Calendar for March 9th, 2026
Department Two – Judge William Abramson
To request a hearing on any matter on this calendar, you must call the Court at 530/283- 6232 by 3:00 p.m., March 6th, 2026, (please leave a voice mail if no one answers), and notice of the intention to appear must also be given to all other parties. If the clerk is not notified of a party’s intention to appear, there will be no hearing and the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court.
If you do appear and want the matter reported by a court reporter in unlimited civil, family law or probate, you must contract with and provide your own court reporter. The Court does not provide an official reporter for these calendars.
PLEASE NOTE –ANY REQUIRED APPEARANCE BY COUNSEL MUST BE DONE BY USING COURT CALL (1-800-882-6878) – UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED IN THESE TENTATIVE RULINGS. ANY REQUIRED APPEARANCE BY A PARTY APPEARING WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY MUST BE DONE BY CALLING THE COURT’S CONFERENCE LINE AT 1-877-336-1829 AND ENTER THE ACCESS CODE 4023142. THE PARTY MUST THEN WAIT ON THE LINE AND MUTE THEIR PHONE UNTIL THE COURT CALLS THEIR CASE.
PROBATE CALENDAR – 9:00 a.m. Case No. PR23-00042 Conservatorship of Hollowell, Terry
Tentative Ruling: Appearance required: Review hearing. Conservator shall prepare case plan, form GC-355 & 356.
Case No. PR24-00042 Conservatorship of Horner, Karson
Tentative Ruling: Appearance required: Annual review, list of expenditures received from Conservator. A case plan, forms GC-355 &356, will need to be prepared.
Case No. PR25-00022 Estate of Sutton, Richard
Tentative Ruling: Appearance required: Morion to Dismiss hearing, trial readiness conference.
Case No. PR25-00005 Estate of Bess, Randy Theordore
Tentative Ruling: Appearance required: Petition for Final Distribution. Court intends to grant petition with the exception of reimbursement to Dave Murray absent further information.
1
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.