DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
2023-01319920·orange·ComplexCivil·Class Action and PAGA Settlement
DENIED

Davis v. Insight Psychology and Addiction, Inc.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action and PAGA Settlement

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
CX105
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement

Monetary amounts referenced

$355,000

Parties

PlaintiffDavis
DefendantInsight Psychology and Addiction, Inc.

Attorneys

Manusfor Plaintiff

Ruling

The court has reviewed and considered the papers, including the supplemental papers, filed in support of plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of an $355,000 class action and PAGA settlement.

In the October 16, 2025 order (ROA 135), the court stated that the “Release by Participating Class Members” provision in paragraph 5.2 was overbroad. The court stated that the release of the class members’ claims must be fairly tailored to the claims that were or reasonably could have been asserted in the lawsuit based on the facts alleged in the operative complaint.

In the January 29, 2026 order (ROA 147), the court stated that the “Release by Participating Class Members” in the amendment to the settlement agreement remained overbroad. The court stated that, in the second sentence, the phrase beginning with “and all other claims” to the end of the sentence should be removed.

Plaintiff’s counsel states that defendant has declined to make the revision to the “Release by Participating Class Members” ordered by the court in the January 29, 2026 order and has otherwise not cooperated with plaintiff’s efforts to prepare the supplemental filings. Supp. Manus Decl. (ROA 158) ¶¶ 3-8.

In addition to the above, the parties have not submitted a revision of paragraph 7.8.4 as ordered in the January 29, 2026 order (ROA 147, No. 2) nor have they submitted a revised notice (ROA 147, Nos. 5, 6) or a revised proposed order (ROA 147, Nos. 7, 8).

Under these circumstances, the court has no alternative but to deny without prejudice plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval.

A status conference is scheduled for August 27, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. in Department CX105. The parties are ordered to file a joint status conference statement at least 5 court days before the hearing. If plaintiff files another motion for preliminary approval before August 27, 2026, the court may vacate the status conference. If the case remains unresolved as of August 27, 2026, the parties’ joint status conference statement should set forth, inter alia, their proposed schedule(s) for briefing and hearing the class certification motion.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share