Pacific Coast Builders, Inc. vs. Tuck
Motion for Attorney Fees
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Cross-Complainants’ Motion for Attorney Fees is CONTINUED to 6/15/26. The parties shall each file a supplemental brief, not to exceed seven pages, no later than 6/1/26, addressing the following issues: 1). Does the bankruptcy stay apply to Plaintiff’s action against Defendant Heather Tuck? 2). Does the stay apply to the Tucks’ Cross-Complaint?
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.