DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
4·orange·Civil·Counsel Withdrawal
GRANTED

Oei vs. Abinante

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
May 15, 2026
Department
W8
Prevailing
Moving Party
Next hearing
Sep 14, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffOei
DefendantMATTHEW ABINANTE

Attorneys

R. SCOTT HARLAN(HARLAN LEGAL, PC)for Defendant

Ruling

information is provided, except for the conclusion that there has been a breakdown of the attorney-client relationship.

A 1-2 day bench trial remains set for 6/15/26, at 8:45 am. The trial was specially set based on Attorney Young’s representations.

4 Oei vs. Abinante Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

The court GRANTS the unopposed Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant MATTHEW ABINANTE filed by attorney R. SCOTT HARLAN (of HARLAN LEGAL, PC).

The court finds moving attorney meets the requirements set forth in Rule 3.1362 of the California Rules of Court.

The order shall not become effective until the filing of a Proof of service showing service of the order on the client.

Moving attorney to give notice and file a proof of service within 14 days.

Upcoming CMC

The court has reviewed the case file, including case management statements filed on 5/11/26. The case is not at-issue. Defendant MATTHEW ABINANTE has filed a demurrer and a motion to strike, which are set for hearing on 7/10/26.

The court CONTINUES the Case Management Conference to Monday, September 14, 2026, at 10:00 am in Dept W8. All appearing parties SHALL file and serve a new timely case management statement at least 15 calendar days prior to the continued hearing as required by the rules, including California Rules of Court rule 3.725 and Local Rule 369.

Plaintiff to give notice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share