DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
30-2021-01184189-CU-PO-CJC·orange·Civil·Civil
GRANTED

Holcomb vs. Aliso Villas Condominium Association

Motion for Attorney Fees

Hearing date
May 14, 2026
Department
CM2
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Motion for Attorney Fees

Monetary amounts referenced

$48,111.00

Parties

PlaintiffScott Palmer Holcomb
DefendantAliso Villas Condominium Association
DefendantTotal Property Management, Inc.

Attorneys

Jody Steinbergfor Defendant

Ruling

Accordingly, the motion of defendants Aliso Villas Condominium Association and Total Property Management, Inc., for an award of $48,111.00 as reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with the appeal brought by plaintiff and appellant Scott Palmer Holcomb is GRANTED.

Moving party to give notice.

2. 30-2025-01469044- Before the Court are the following TEN (10) motions: two CU-PO-CJC (2) Motions to Compel Further Responses to Request for Michaud vs. Production of Documents (“MF-RFP”), Set Two, and Costco Wholesale Sanctions (ROA 446), brought by Plaintiff Valeda Michaud, Membership, Inc by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Melanie Michaud (collectively, “Michaud”), and Charles Michaud (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), one against Defendant Costo Wholesale Corporation (“Corporation”), and one against Defendant Costco Wholesale Membership, Inc. (“Membership”) (collectively, “Defendants”); two (2) MF- RFP, Set One, and Sanctions (ROA 450) brought by Plaintiffs, one against Corporation, and one against Membership; a Motion to Compel the Deposition (“MC- DEPO”) of Corporation’s employee Leigh Ann Ruijters (“Ruijters”), and Sanctions (ROA 451), brought by Michaud against Corporation; a Motion to Compel Further Responses to Request for Admissions (“MF-RFA”), Set Two, and Sanctions (ROA 453), brought by Plaintiffs against Membership; two (2) Motions to Compel Further Responses to Special Interrogatories (“MF-SROG”), Set Two (ROA 262), and Sanctions, brought by Plaintiffs, one against Corporation, and one against Membership; and two (2) MF- SROG, Set One, and Sanctions (ROA 449), brought by Plaintiffs, one against Membership, and one against Corporation.

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that on March 27, 2026, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to file amended motions, declarations, and separate statements for the pending motions. ROA 400. On April 8, 2026, Plaintiffs filed amended moving papers as to all pending motions except for Plaintiffs’ MF-SROG, Set Two (ROA 262). The Court

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share