DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
2025-01511904·orange·Civil·Civil
DENIED

WEBER VS. MORADO

DEMURRER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
C32
Prevailing
Opposing Party

Motion type

Demurrer

Parties

PlaintiffWEBER
DefendantCORINNE MORADO
DefendantGENCARE CONNECTS, INC.
DefendantDAIAN CORPORATION

Ruling

Defendants Corinne Morado; Gencare Connects, Inc.; and Daian Corporation’s Demurrer to the Complaint is DENIED as moot. “The filing of the first amended complaint rendered the defendant's demurrer moot since an amendatory pleading supersedes the original one, which ceases to perform any function as a pleading.” (Sylmar Air Conditioning v. Pueblo Contracting Services, Inc. (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 1049, 1054, (cleaned up).) “A party may amend its pleading once without leave of the court at any time before the answer, demurrer, or motion to strike is filed, or after a demurrer or motion to strike is filed but before the demurrer or motion to strike is heard if the amended pleading is filed and served no later than the date for filing an opposition to the demurrer or motion to strike.” (Code Civ. Proc., § 472(a).) Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on January 30, 2026. Thus, the Complaint ceased to function as a pleading and the Demurrer to the Complaint is moot.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share