DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
24-01393804·orange·Civil·Contract
GRANTED

National Funding, Inc. vs. Sanders Family Enterprises Inc.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record

Hearing date
May 12, 2026
Department
C25
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffNational Funding, Inc.
DefendantSanders Family Enterprises Inc.
DefendantAmanda Sanders

Ruling

notice of hearing of the application on all parties who have appeared in the cause and on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office.” (See Declaration of Tracy Yao, ¶ 4.) The proof of service attached to the instant application indicates service by U.S. Mail and electronic mail only on Plaintiff’s counsel and does not show compliance with Rule 9.40(c)(1).

Defendant to file proof of service by mail of the application and notice of hearing of the application on the State Bar of California at its San Francisco office no later than nine (9) court days before the continued hearing date.

The Court orders clerk to give notice

106 National Funding, Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record x 2 Inc. vs. Sanders Family Enterprises Inc. Jeffery P. Boykin (“Moving Attorney”) moves to be relieved as counsel of record for Sanders Family 24-01393804 Enterprises Inc. and Amanda Sanders.

The motions are unopposed and Moving Attorney has stated a basis for permissive withdrawal under the Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.16. All other requirements of the applicable California Rules of Court are satisfied.

Accordingly, the motions are GRANTED.

The orders relieving counsel will be effective upon counsel filing proof of service of a copy of the signed order on the clients and on all parties that have appeared in the case. (California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1362(e).)

Moving Attorney to give notice.

107 Ramirez vs. Motion for Reconsideration Carriage Stop Motel

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share