DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
30-2025-01489744·orange·Civil·Civil
TAKEN OFF CALENDAR

Baldoni vs. Hill

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary Adjudication

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
N15
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Motion for Summary Judgment

Parties

PlaintiffBaldoni
DefendantHill

Ruling

sought an order setting aside the ACLO in its entirety. (See ROA #106.)

The second step of this analysis identifies the relief actually obtained through the court and the third step addresses both parties’ litigation objectives, which involves a review of their pleadings, briefs and other sources.

The court is familiar with this litigation and has reviewed the case files.

Petitioners did not achieve their goal of setting aside the ACLO in its entirety. While the court found that Respondent’s findings of the volume discharge calculations were not supported by substantial evidence, the court did not find that Respondent lacked authority to impose a penalty based on the quantity of stormwater discharged. Further, Petitioners unsuccessfully advanced numerous challenges, both substantive and procedural, to the ACLO.

The court finds that neither Petitioners nor Respondent are prevailing parties for purposes of Section 1032(a)(4).

Therefore, neither party is entitled to an award of costs and the court will grant the motion to strike costs.

Respondent shall give notice of this ruling.

Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Summary 7 30-2025-01489744 Adjudication

Defendant Linda Isle Community Association’s Baldoni vs. Hill Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication is taken OFF CALENDAR pursuant to Defendant Linda Isle Community Association’s Notice of Withdrawal and Taking Off-Calendar of the Motin for Summary Judgment and the Hearing Scheduled for May 11, 2026 (ROA #127), filed April 10, 2026.

Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel 30-2023-01348993 8 Counsel Edwin B. Brown’s Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel for Defendant Aronas Corporation is DENIED without prejudice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share