DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
308·orange·Civil·Civil
CONTINUED

Malchow vs. Secure One Capital Corporation

Motion to serve defendant

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
C24
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
May 26, 2026

Motion type

Other

Parties

PlaintiffStephanie Malchow
DefendantSecure One Capital Corporation

Ruling

Causes of Action, with 15 days leave to amend. In light of that ruling, the Zhou Demurrer is MOOT.

Yang/Guanjin shall give notice.

308 Malchow vs. Plaintiff Stephanie Malchow’s motion to serve Secure One defendant Secure One Capital Corporation is Capital CONTINUED to 5/26/26 at 1:30pm in Department Corporation C24.

The notice of motion, memorandum of points and authorities and declaration are not properly signed. (See Code of Civ. Proc. § 128.7, subd. (a), § 2015.5; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.257(b).) Counsel’s declaration also fails to state whether efforts were made to serve the corporation through its officers by mail and acknowledgment of receipt pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 415.30, subdivision (a) (in addition to attempts at personal service and substitute service). (See Corp. Code § 1702, subd. (a); Code of Civ. Proc. § 416.10, subd. (b).)

Plaintiff shall file corrected and updated documents at least 10 days before the next hearing date.

The court continues the OSC to 5/26/26 at 1:30pm.

309 Norviel vs. FCA Defendant FCA US, LLC’s (Defendant) demurrer to US LLC the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff John Norviel (Plaintiff) is OVERRULED. Defendant’s motion to strike is DENIED.

Defendant shall file an answer to the FAC by 5/21/26.

Motion No. 1: Demurrer

Statute of Repose

The court concludes the six-year statute of repose under Code of Civil Procedure section 871.21,

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share