Wei vs. Sarkis
Demurrer to Complaint
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Accordingly, because Luckett has not obtained a prefiling order in this case, the motion is GRANTED and the case is dismissed. (Code Civ. Proc. § 391.7(c).)
Clerk to give notice.
If parties/counsel wish to give argument, the hearing will be continued to July 16, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. C44. Plaintiff is to appear in person, pursuant to the minute order dated 11/20/25 (ROA 35).
8 Wei vs. Sarkis Demurrer to Complaint
2025-01509812 Defendants Anthony M. Sarkis and Shivangini Chudhary’s demurrer to the complaint of Yilu Amanda Wei is OVERRULED without prejudice. There is no proof of service in the court’s file that indicates that defendants served the notice of demurrer and supporting documents on the Ms. Wei. Further, there is no indication that defendant met their statutory meet and confer obligations under Ca. Civ. Pro. Section 430.41.
Clerk to give notice.
If parties/counsel wish to give argument, the hearing will be continued to July 16, 2026 at 1:30 p.m. in Dept. C44.
Cited authorities
Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.