DecisionDepot
California Legal Research
All cases
CU0002622·nevada·Civil·Civil
On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

Stanley Cosby, et al. vs. Penn Valley Fire Protection District

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
May 11, 2026
Department
6
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 24, 2026
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Other

Ruling

not signed by Mellissa Steenson. (See Civ. Proc. Code 431.30).

8. CU0002524 Diana Dentoni vs. Sonya Sokolow No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendants no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

The Court notes that the proof of service of summons filed by Plaintiff does not include a signed acknowledgement of receipt. See Civ. Proc. Code 415.30(c).

9. CU0002622 Stanley Cosby, et al. vs. Penn Valley Fire Protection District No appearances are required. On the Court’s motion, the case management conference is continued to August 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6, to permit adjudication of pending motions.

10. CU0002624 Rachael Perry vs. Barbara Jean Roth, et al. No appearances are required. On its own motion, the Court continues the case management conference to August 24, 2026, at 9:00 a.m., in Department 6. Plaintiff shall file a proof of service, an application for service by publication (as appropriate), or a request for dismissal of Defendant Estate of Richard Roth no later than two weeks prior to the continued case management conference date.

11. TCU22-8066 Theodore Lachowicz, et al. vs. Mark Tanner Construction Inc, et al. Appearances by Mark Tanner Construction are required regarding the request for default judgment of Mark Henry HVAC, Inc.

The order to show cause issued to counsel for Blake Hoffman Hardwood Floors is dismissed in the interest of justice. The Court has now received requests for dismissal from all other parties. The cross-complaint filed by Blake Hoffman Hardwood Floors is dismissed with prejudice.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…

Extracted by Gemini Flash from the ruling text. Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Powered by Gemini Flash Lite. Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Source

Share